EEG analysis methods in neurolinguistics: a short review
Cikk címe: EEG analysis methods in neurolinguistics: a short review
Szerzők: Dr. Juhász Zoltán, Mohamed F. Issa, Prof. Dr. Kozmann György
Intézmények: Pannon Egyetem Műszaki Informatikai Kar, University of Pannonia Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems Veszprem Hungary, IME Szerkesztőség
Évfolyam: XVII. évfolyam
Lapszám: 2018. / 02. lapszám
Oldal: 48-53
Rovat: KÉPALKOTÓ DIAGNOSZTIKA
Alrovat: KUTATÁS - FEJLESZTÉS
Absztrakt:
A neurolingvisztikai problémák (kvázi-részletes) kvan titatív vizsgálata egyre bonyolultabb mérési és mérés-értelmezési feladatok megoldását/bevezetését igényli. Értelemszerűen a kutatás igényli az intenzív orvosmérnök kooperációt. Jelen dolgozat igyekszik logikus csoportosításban eljutni a korai próbálkozásoktól a ma leghatékonyabbnak tekinthető módszerek be mutatásáig, hivatkozva a releváns irodalomra. Biomér nöki kutatócsoportunk az orvosi-nyelvészeti kérdésekben a Pannon Egyetem Magyar és Alkalmazott Nyelv tudományi Intézetére, ill. a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Élettani Intézetére támaszkodik.
Abstract:
The quantitative analysis of neurolinguistics tasks requires complex measurement and evaluation methods. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of these research tasks, the cooperation of medical, engineer and linguistic experts is necessary. This paper presents the most prevalent EEG analysis methods, from simple to complex, that can help us in understanding the neural basis of language processing. Our research group works in collaboration with the Hungarian and Applied Linguistics Institute of the University of Pannonia and the Department of Physiology of the University of Szeged.
XVII. évfolyam
2018. / 02. lapszám / Március
| Szerző | Intézmény |
|---|---|
| Dr. Juhász Zoltán | Pannon Egyetem Műszaki Informatikai Kar |
| Mohamed F. Issa | University of Pannonia Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems Veszprem Hungary |
| Prof. Dr. Kozmann György | IME Szerkesztőség |
[1] Carreiras M, Armstrong BC, M. Perea M, Frost R: The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition, Trends Cogn. Sci., Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 90–98, Feb. 2014.
[2] Whelan R: Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data, Psychol. Rec., Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 475–482, Jul. 2008.
[3] Nunez PL, Srinivasan R: Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, USA, 2005.
[4] Jurcak V, Tsuzuki D, Dan I:10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems, Neuroimage, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 1600–11, Feb. 2007.
[5] Kim KHS, Relkin NR, Lee KM, and Hirsch J: Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages, Nature, Vol. 388, No. 6638, pp. 171–174, 1997.
[6] Laszlo S Plaut DC: A neurally plausible Parallel Distri buted Processing model of Event-Related Potential word reading data,” Brain Lang., Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 271–281, 2012.
[7] Hagoort P: The core and beyond in the language-ready brain, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., Vol. 81, pp. 194–204,2017.
[8] van Heuven WJB, Dijkstra T: Language comprehension in the bilingual brain: fMRI and ERP support for psycholinguistic models,” Brain Res. Rev., Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 104–122, 2010.
[9] Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB: FASTER: Fully Auto mated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection, J. Neurosci. Methods, Vol. 192, No. 1, pp. 152–162, Sep. 2010.
[10] Correa G, Laciar E, Patiño EH, Valentinuzzi ME: Artifact removal from EEG signals using adaptive filters in cascade, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 90, p. 12081, Nov. 2007.
[11] Kuipers JR, Thierry G: Bilingualism and increased attention to speech: Evidence from event-related potentials, Brain Lang., Vol. 149, pp. 27–32, 2015.
[12] Martin CD, Costa A, Dering B, Hoshino N, Wu YJ, Thierry G: Effects of speed of word processing on semantic access: The case of bilingualism, Brain Lang., Vol. 120, No. 1, pp. 61–65, 2012.
[13] Leminen A, Clahsen H, Lehtonen M: Morphologically Complex Words in the Mind/Brain (Editorial). Front. Hum. Neurosci., 16 Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum. 2016.00047
[14] Pellikka J, Helenius P, Mäkelä JP, Lehtonen M: Context affects L1 but not L2 during bilingual word recognition: An MEG study, Brain Lang., Vol. 142, pp. 8–17, 2015.
[15] Carreiras M, Armstrong BC, Perea M, Frost R: The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition, Trends Cogn. Sci., Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 90–98, 2014.
[16] Moreno EM, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Laine M: Event-related potentials (ERPs) in the study of bilingual language processing, J. Neurolinguistics, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 477–508, Nov. 2008.
[17] Buzsaki G, Draguhn A: Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks, Science, Vol. 304, No. 5679, pp. 1926–1929, Jun. 2004.
[18] Portnoff M: Time-frequency representation of digital signals and systems based on short-time Fourier analysis, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 55–69, Feb. 1980.
[19] Samar VJ, Bopardikar A, Rao R, Swartz K: Wavelet Analysis of Neuroelectric Waveforms: A Conceptual Tutorial, Brain Lang., Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 7–60, 1999.
[20] Herrmann CS, Grigutsch M, Busch NA: EEG oscillations and wavelet analysis, Eventrelated potentials – a methods Handb., No. January 2004, pp. 229–261, 2004.
[21] Lewis GA, Wang L, Bastiaansen M: Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: Unification versus maintenance and prediction?, Brain Lang., Vol. 148, pp. 51– 63, 2015.
[22] Grabner RH, Brunner C, Leeb R, Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G: Event-related EEG theta and alpha band oscillatory responses during language translation, Brain Research Bulletin, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 57–65, 2007.
[23] Wang Y, Xiang J, Vannest J, Holroyd T, Narmoneva D, Horn P, Liu Y, Rose D, deGrauw T, Holland S: Neuro magnetic measures of word processing in bilinguals and monolinguals, Clin. Neurophysiol., Vol. 122, No. 9, pp. 1706–1717, 2011.
[24] Correia JM, Jansma B, Hausfeld L, Kikkert S, Bonte M, EEG decoding of spoken words in bilingual listeners: from words to language invariant semantic-conceptual representations., Front. Psychol., vol. 6, p. 71, 2015.
[25] Weiss S, Mueller HM: The contribution of EEG coherence to the investigation of language, Brain Lang., Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 325–343, 2003.
[26] Sporns O: Brain connectivity, Scholarpedia, Vol. 2, No. 10, p. 4695, Oct. 2007.
[27] Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS: Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain., Neurotherapeutics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 316–29, Jul. 2007.
[28] Friston KJ: Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review, Brain Connect., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 13–36, 2011.
[29] Rubinov M and Sporns O: Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations, Neuro image, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 1059–1069, Sep. 2010.
[30] Babiloni F, Cincotti F, BabiloniC, Carducci F, Mattia D, Astolfi L, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Ding L, Ni Y, Cheng J, Christine K, SweeneyJ, He B: Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function, Neuroimage, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 118–131, Jan. 2005.
[31] Xu M, Wang T, Chen S, Fox PT, Tan LH: Effective connectivity of brain regions related to visual word recognition: An fMRI study of Chinese reading, Hum. Brain Mapp., Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 2580–2591, Jul. 2015.
[32] Guàrdia-Olmos J, Peró-Cebollero M, Zarabozo-Hurtado D, González-Garrido AA, Gudayol-Ferré E: Effective con – nectivity of visual word recognition and homophone orthographic errors., Front. Psychol., Vol. 6, p. 640, 2015.